Strategic Consulting & Audits

Expert Guidance for Complex Growth Decisions
As marketplace businesses scale, they face increasingly complex strategic decisions: Should we expand to Walmart or focus on Amazon optimization? How do we balance marketplace growth with DTC investment? What's the optimal balance between Amazon Seller and Vendor? Should we launch new brands or SKU-extend existing ones? These decisions require deep marketplace expertise, competitive intelligence, and data-driven frameworks - not guesswork or gut instinct.
Our strategic consulting and audit services provide expert guidance for high-stakes decisions and strategic inflection points. We bring 15+ years of hands-on marketplace experience managing $2B+ across 200+ brands, proven strategic frameworks developed through thousands of client scenarios, and objective third-party perspective unbiased by agency revenue incentives. Consulting engagements range from focused audits (2-3 weeks) to comprehensive growth strategy development (8-12 weeks).
Unlike generic consulting firms, our recommendations are grounded in hands-on marketplace data and modeling. We analyze your actual performance data (sales, advertising, margins, customer behavior), model different strategic scenarios with ROI projections, benchmark against category leaders and competitors, and deliver actionable recommendations with clear implementation roadmaps. Every recommendation includes expected impact, required investment, timeline to results, and key success metrics.
Consulting Services
Growth Audits: Comprehensive Account Analysis and Opportunity Identification
Our Amazon account audit examines every element of your Amazon presence: advertising campaign structure and performance, product listing quality and conversion rates, inventory management and forecasting accuracy, account health and compliance issues, pricing strategy and Buy Box performance, and competitive positioning within your category. The 2-3 week audit delivers a prioritized opportunity roadmap with estimated revenue impact, implementation complexity, and timeline for each recommendation.
For brands considering marketplace expansion, we conduct readiness assessments analyzing operational capacity, financial resources, product-market fit for target platforms, and competitive landscape. We evaluate which marketplaces (Walmart, Target, Instacart, TikTok Shop) offer the best ROI given your category, price point, and brand positioning. The assessment includes detailed expansion roadmaps, resource requirements, investment projections, and expected timelines to profitability.
For existing Shopify DTC operations, we audit site performance, conversion funnels, customer acquisition efficiency, retention strategies, and profitability economics. Using conversion rate optimization methodologies, we identify quick wins (1-week implementation) and strategic initiatives (multi-month projects) that drive sustainable DTC growth. The audit reveals whether DTC warrants increased investment or if marketplace focus delivers better ROI.
Strategic Frameworks: Channel Strategy, Brand Architecture & D2C Models
Channel strategy development determines optimal revenue mix across marketplaces and owned channels. We help brands choose between Amazon-first strategies (80%+ revenue from Amazon), balanced multi-channel approaches (diversified across 3-5 platforms), or DTC-focused models (Shopify as primary channel with marketplaces for discovery). The right strategy depends on product economics, category dynamics, brand positioning, competitive landscape, and long-term business objectives (growth vs. profitability vs. eventual exit).
As product portfolios grow, brand architecture decisions become critical: Should new products launch under existing brand equity or separate brands? How do we prevent channel conflict between premium positioning on DTC and value pricing on Amazon? When does portfolio complexity (managing multiple brands) outweigh revenue diversification benefits? We develop brand architecture frameworks that maximize revenue while managing operational complexity, channel conflict, and brand equity protection.
DTC viability depends on unit economics and LTV:CAC ratios. We model customer acquisition costs across paid channels (Facebook, Google, TikTok), estimate customer lifetime value based on repeat purchase rates and margins, calculate breakeven timelines and payback periods, and determine sustainable customer acquisition budgets. If LTV:CAC ratios are unfavorable (below 3:1), marketplace-focused strategies often deliver better ROI. Our frameworks provide clear decision criteria grounded in financial reality.
FAQ
Category and brand maturity drive the split more than any universal rule. For a mature brand in a branded-search-dominated category (established supplements, legacy CPG), a reasonable starting split is 65% Sponsored Products / 15% Sponsored Brands / 10% Sponsored Display / 10% DSP. Brands in commodity categories without a dominant search term benefit from pushing Sponsored Brands higher (25%) and DSP harder (20%) to earn share of voice rather than defend it. The common mistake: brands running $50K/month on Sponsored Products with zero DSP because Sponsored Products feels more measurable, leaving 30–40% of addressable demand unreached.
Holdout-market testing is the only clean answer. Pause Amazon ad spend in a geographically controlled holdout market for 3–4 weeks while running normally elsewhere, and measure DTC lift in the control versus holdout. AMC's cross-channel overlap reports help but require DSP plus a non-trivial identity stitch between Amazon shoppers and DTC CRM. Anything short of holdout testing is correlation, not causation, and correlation gets you a 70% overattributed halo number that justifies any budget decision you want. Most brands we work with discover actual halo is 15–25% of what their previous agency was claiming.
Start by modeling contribution margin over the repurchase window, not the first order. If your LTV looks like $180 revenue against $45 ad spend over 18 months for a supplement brand, your LTV-adjusted break-even TACOS is 25%, not the 15% that first-order accounting would suggest. The catch is that Amazon's closed-garden attribution doesn't show repurchase cleanly. You need Subscribe & Save data plus brand-level order history to model it, and most agencies don't build the view. This is where AMC plus a warehouse pipe (iDerive for us, something similar elsewhere) earns back its cost inside of a year.
When three conditions align: (1) chargebacks and AVN (Annual Vendor Negotiations) allowances are eating more margin than the Vendor-exclusive advertising benefits create; (2) your brand has enough organic pull that you don't need Amazon's 1P merchandising to move units; (3) you have the operational capacity to run your own ads, catalog, and inventory planning. For most mid-size brands, the flip pays back inside 6–9 months once chargeback erosion crosses ~4% of 1P revenue and co-op asks cross 8%. The transition itself is painful. Expect 30–60 days of revenue disruption as ASINs migrate.
When you’ve outgrown pre-built reports, meaning your questions no longer match any canned dashboard. Helium 10 and similar tools are rules-based: they tell you what’s happening against known benchmarks. AMC is query-based: it answers questions no one’s pre-built for you ("what’s my path-to-purchase overlap between Sponsored Products and DSP for new-to-brand customers who came from competitor-conquest keywords?"). The trigger for graduating is usually (a) DSP spend above $50K/month, (b) cross-ad-type path analysis Sponsored Ads reports can’t produce, or (c) stitching Amazon behavior into a larger data model across DTC, retail-media networks, and CRM. Under those conditions, AMC typically cuts 15–25% of ad waste inside two quarters. Outside them — a $2M brand running Sponsored Products only — AMC is overkill and a dashboard tool tells you what you need.
In the first 30 days with a new Amazon agency, expect discovery, audit, and access handoff, not live campaign changes. Days 31–60 bring foundation changes (campaign restructures, listing optimization, creative briefs). Days 61–90 produce the first real performance signal and a rolling 90-day plan. A good agency spends days 1–30 auditing your account, documenting baseline performance, and identifying quick-win opportunities. You should expect very little execution in the first two weeks, reporting and diagnostic calls instead. Days 61–90 produce initial performance signal from the foundation changes, first strategic recommendations based on actual data, and alignment on a rolling 90-day plan for the next quarter. If an agency is “running campaigns” in week 1, they’re either skipping the audit or rebadging work they did on another account.
A 12-month retainer is industry-standard for full-service Amazon agencies. Neither inherently normal nor a red flag on its own. The real signal is in the terms. 12-month contracts are standard because account integration, catalog work, and creative production have real switching costs. Agencies write the math assuming they’ll amortize those over a year. Red flags in a 12-month contract: no mid-term off-ramp clause, termination penalty exceeding one month of retainer, or required pre-payment for more than one quarter. Good 12-month terms include a 90-day trial period with no-fault termination, 30-day notice for cause (underperformance against agreed KPIs), and no penalty for standard termination at natural quarter boundaries.